Contact Us Call: (770) 929-1665

US v. Doe

In a habeas corpus case, the district court’s denial of defendant’s 28 U.S.C. section 2255 motion is vacated and remanded where: 1) defendant’s case is not moot because success would shorten his supervised release term; 2) jurisdiction exists because cognizability is not always a jurisdictional limit; 3) the district court should determine whether defendant is entitled to reinstate his 2008 motion under F.R.C.P. Rule 60; and 4) Begay v. US, 553 U.S. 137 (2008), applies retroactively and error is cognizable on collateral review where not defaulted.

Posted on behalf of M. Qader A. Baig & Associates, LLC Attorneys and Counselors at Law

913 Commercial Street
Conyers, GA 30012

Phone: (770) 929-1665

FAX: (770) 929-1197

Email:

Mon - Fri: 9:00AM - 5:00PM

Skip footer