US v. Gorski

In interlocutory appeals from a district court order that, among other things, compels a law firm to produce certain documents pertaining to a fraud allegedly committed by defendant in his operation of a construction company, the order is: 1) affirmed as to the production order as to the law firm; but 2) vacated as to the district court’s decision to exclude defendant’s communications with his personal attorney from the production order and remand that portion of its order.